Monday, February 20, 2012

Dear Corny Dudes,


You would be doing a SPLENDID thing if you'd stop allowing chicks to think they stated something SMART, FUNNY, INTERESTING, or IMPORTANT just because you find her decent-looking and she has a vagina. You will not be the recipient of vaginal, oral or manual (other than your own) sex due to "liking" something a chick said that wasn't even worth her computer device allowing her to finish typing. All you did is green light at least her next 20-30 idiotic statements. Multiply that by 20 other corny dudes like you, and you got 400-600 things she said that she thought were meaningful that should have remained in her overrated head. And when someone opposes her little comments, she'll think something is wrong with THAT PERSON. And you're more to blame than she is. So do me a favor and stop brown-nosin' (finish the "Doggystyle" skit if you 'bout it in the comment space). Thaaaanx.

-I'm StarPower, and I approve this message.



"Right, this is nothing you haven't heard before. That doesn't mean you shouldn't hear it again."


"I don't care if you condemn or condone, I just hope that you have the capacity to consider."


"I don't stand for much, but if I fall for THIS bullshit, then I don't deserve to have legs."


"So I round up the gypsies,

and instruct them to move.

I tell 'em something just hit me,

y'all know what we gotta do..."


"It's not that serious," were the last words I ever heard him/her say.

As an adult, you aren't a lump of clay still being molded into something familiar to this world. By now, whether you know/accept it or not, you are something in particular. What you are has been shaped by the cultures that have dominated your life. Sure, you can change, even though that's hard, but you are something specific becoming more and more of it everyday.

So think about what that is/who you are because you may be lying to yourself regarding what kind of person you are. Don't half-ass it and say "you're trying." BS. If you're gonna be of this world in a broader sense, wanting the nice things, accolades and accomplishments that most people recognize as success, then don't think that complies w/a greater sense of enlightenment, righteousness and spirituality. I don't think it does.

If you're not gonna be on some Gandhi, Mother Theresa-type shit, sure, you may have good intentions much of the time, but really, you're just half-assing it in life. If you're not gonna be on some win-at-all-costs-I-can-afford shit, you're half-assing it and playing yourself by pretending that you have a code and you're about doing the right thing (as far as REAL right and wrong as determined by your GUT and CONSCIENCE goes).

If you buy expensive shit, want the trophy partner, the big crib, are entertained by things that are harmful and don't try YOUR BEST to keep your desires and emotions in check, etc, YOU AREN'T really so great of a person. I don't care how nice you are, how much you've learned, or how much nice shit you do for people.

What I mean is, we know someone that we consider an amazing human being, but it's really a percentile thing - what we really mean is that that person measures nearer to the top on a scale of goodness (that has been curving downward for years) when compared with the other people we know. How good is that person when wearing some expensive shit, that we have no problem with them having because "they worked so hard for it and earned it" (that seems to justify a lotta things), and yet that pricey garment was made at a sweat factory in a third world country with no child labor laws? What was that person's ATTEMPT at being better in that particular circumstance? None. There was no attempt. How about the amazing person you know who gets let off the hook for not-so-good behavior because they are attractive? Or who doesn't recycle purposefully? Or who eats way more, or uses more water than any person needs to, but doesn't do anything to contribute positively to the global hunger/water epidemic?

I probably sound ridiculous to most of you because most of you probably compare yourself and all the people you know to each other, which makes sense. But understand this: you really don't know that many people, I don't care where the hell you've been, no one knows enough people to make a decent personal comparison of one's ranking on the scale that measures contribution towards the greater good. However, you don't need to personally know millions - you have an internal moral compass that sets and resets itself when you learn new things. The best people you know ignore it when it comes to a lot of situations, especially situations no, or few, other human(s) whose opinions are important to them have to know about while it counts.

You probably think I'm nitpicking, holding people accountable for following an impossible standard, but nothing is too small to be ignored. Every wrong needs attention. Yes, murder is worse than not recycling, but in most cases, almost every one, a series of very small wrongs, maybe over a long period of time, perpetrated by a wide range of people in different circumstances, culminated in that murder. Nothing is really random, or doesn't have roots and seeds which go back very far. Conversely, that lack of recycling will add up and eventually will contribute to people making some really drastic decisions at some point regarding the most valuable thing we have in a material life - the Earth; decisions that will make a murder look like a very small thing. This may take centuries to come to pass, but it will happen, it will be important, and it could be preventable or staved off for much longer if we are actually better and not making half-assed attempts at it that we pass along to future generations as sufficient.

It may sound like I'm judging, (which all writers do, get over it and stop acting like "judging" is a horrible thing; it's one of the most human things ever and we all do it all day, relax) and I'm telling you to be a better person, but I'm not. Sort of. I'm saying that if you're working towards being a better person, when will you be satisfied? Better than yesterday is cool but are you willing to go where your gut, your instinct, your conscience, directs you 100% of the time? If not, then 1. you are rationalizing and fearful of really following the greatness inside and 2. shut the fuck up on facebook regarding anything good or bad that anyone does because you're no better, just probably better in some areas. I'm saying that if you want the worldly accomplishments and achievements then you're just like the people you judge every day. The judging, while bad in the greater cosmic sense, is fine in comparison to what everyone else does, but you suck for thinking for a second that you're on more solid moral ground. If you want to dominate in this world, to be seen and heard because you think you should be and want the attention, if you desire to be king/queen, then don't let your pitiful aspirations to better person-ness, (which really are just attempts to assuage your guilt for not being better) hinder you from your goals. That's half-assing it.

Ideally, we'd all work tirelessly towards the greater good (if there even is such a thing, because if there can never be a point where the world would be best for people for generations, then there is no point in trying, there is no perfection, there must be another point to life or maybe there is no point at all - which is a scary concept on many levels, a concept that the amoral possibly grasp before anyone else, but I digress flagrantly), but if we aren't/won't work(ing) towards that, then work hard towards fulfilling your desires in this world w/o the ethical roadblocks.

I'd say that the only caveat is that you should try not to hurt people too much because when people are hurt to the point where the pain inflicted becomes a defining characteristic, they (rightfully) become obstacles to progress that can be very very hard to overcome. On your way to becoming better, or better at not fooling yourself into thinking you care a lot about being better, you don't want to have to deal with people you could have avoiding hurting so bad that they become an avoidable, immovable hindrance. Hurt can be good but I'm talking about reckless hurt. I think you should try to avoid that.)

Thursday, December 22, 2011

F-ck You, (Don't) Pay Me

I don't believe in ANY form of compensation tied to teacher performance while there is no effective method to evaluate student achievement for different learners. Or differentiate good teachers from those good at teaching to tests. (Then again, maybe I'm just naive and/or ignorant, not realizing that teaching to the test IS good teaching? I'm pretty sure it isn't, but I guess I could be wrong.) J, for example, is very smart. No test shows this. I induce achievement in J. There is no system in place which leaves me the energy, or provides me the resources, to prove it. Even if there was, those in charge would not value it in comparison to "standard assessment." So Mr. Collins, and his outside-the-box understanding of outside-the-box achievement would be on the outside looking in when it comes to compensating so-called "top-performing" teachers. No, I don't have the answer, but this isn't that kinda post anyway.

Tuesday, November 29, 2011

Kinda Crazy.

Kinda crazy.
14 years ago a college rep told me only a miracle could get me into a decent school.
11 years ago I was flunking horribly outta my second school.
8 years ago I had no job and no prospects for a good future. I still kinda believed though. So did my wife.
5 years ago I was a loser 7th year undergrad who couldn't finish school and show something meaningful for my life. I got fired from my first meaningful job, almost went crazy and worse, and lived to make a record chronicling most of it, "The Petting Zoo" (www.starpower.bandcamp.com).
4 years ago I was very tired and prayed very hard for very long, and was given a new lens which enabled me to change jobs, and support things greater than myself.
3 years ago I received a fellowship and got married.
1 year ago I received my masters degree.
6 months ago I became a tenured teacher.
12 weeks ago I was mentoring and coaching bright, young teachers.
One hour ago I received an e-mail inviting me to train to join a team which will select and identify some of the best teaching candidates in NYC.
Making it outta my mother's 14 year old womb was an accomplishment.
Not freezing to death, getting arrested, or giving up were additional achievements.
I wasn't supposed to succeed so many times it isn't funny.
I couldn't see the light on many, many...many days.
I stood in front of many of you, on many occasions, even on stages, holding myself together with the last scraps of dignity I had left.
I kinda knew it would be ok though.
Although I allow myself to breathe a little now and say I succeeded, it's still really, really rough in other ways.
But I still kinda know it'll be ok.
I really hope you do too.
Because it will.

I'm StarPower, and I approve this message.

Friday, November 11, 2011

Conscious Crusaders

At this stage in life I realize it is supremely hypocritical to rally against all of those things one enjoys the spoils of each day. This doesn't at all mean we can't point out the tragic state of things like wars, big business, the family dynamic, race relations, etc. But if you're not with at least openly recognizing how uneven (euphemism) it is for you to play Conscious Crusader while constantly and purposely making decisions each day to BE about most of the things that are the opposite of what you TALK about, well then I'm not yet mature enough not to say don't say shit to me with your fake ass.

Everyone is contradictory. I understand that. But that's a lot different than being someone who works very hard to convince you that s/he is working hard to be a much better version of who s/he is. Those types ALWAYS hang together, by the way.

Life is complex, and although I will never accept the sad nature of the things we do to each other, the path to righteousness is tricky, to say the least, and I recognize that men and women wiser than me have spent lifetimes trying to reconcile this fact. The good and bad, all the grey areas, everything that makes us boo and cheer, exist in a web that becomes tangled and untangled at a rate which exceeds our understanding.

My belief is that each person should just figure out what his/her contribution should be, based on what s/he thinks are the best decisions. There is a judge, but I haven't met him/her/it, and I'm sure it's none of you. It sure isn't me.

I'm StarPower, and I approve this message.

Sunday, November 6, 2011

The Wave Files or Anti-Social Studies (Tech?{no})

Ever used an Elmo? No, not the red-faced dude on the right, but the document camera and projection system I'm currently using in my class during lessons. It's a very useful tool of any information sharing trade. It's better than normal projectors educators are used to using because it can project anything under it's camera onto a wall. Meaning, I can teach any reading, writing or mathematical concept by projecting useful visuals, making an 8" by 11" piece of paper into a 5' by 8' picture in front of the classroom. I can manipulate this giant image in real-time. I can also project a website onto the wall and move through different webpages, enabling kids who learn better by processing images and sounds to stay engaged in a lesson. You wouldn't believe how many kids are acting up and out just because they have no way into what is being taught.

Elmos are kind of expensive but not as much as a lot of other things in a school. I say each class needs one, along with a couple of computers/printers (if there is ANY place that should have computers in every room, it's a school, no?) and a smartboard, something I've never had the opportunity to instruct with. (A video and audio recording set-up would be nice too, but that may be reaching just a bit.) If there is not commitment to getting this done on a macro level, then educators need to see what they can do for their individual classrooms. Anything less is shortchanging the students.

Our kids don't have these things and tech like this makes a HUGE difference in students accessing the nuances of any given lesson. I'm teaching w/no computer, no smartboard, no dependable copy machine or printer, few supplies, etc. I'm in it to win it, so I know how to work this situation. I'm not complaining (although all complaints from caring educators in all fields who are in similar situations are CERTAINLY valid) so much as expressing a bit of disappointment regarding what "is" in light of "what could be" if resources were distributed evenly.

Kids speak a futuristic language. I'm trying to access it the best I can while still showing them the importance of the lost arts we learned in school (dictionary skills, handwriting, times table memorization, etc.). But to be real, the instructors (teachers, administrators, curriculum developers, policy makers) need instructing more than the kids do if instruction is to really mean something nowadays. The responsible adults have to be open to the possibility of non-traditional ways of educating potentially being as useful as the generally accepted methods. I just had to endure an imperative stating that I am to rearrange my classroom because the administration doesn't understand the purpose of my non-traditional set-up. That conversation is for another blog though. We have to accept a new understanding of what education is in 2011. Time is of the essence and we can't waste it not being purposeful about everything we say to kids.

There will be a very clear and direct link between how we (and/or what we accepted regarding the way society chose to) educate our kids during this period of time, and the decline in the general quality of life we experience in the future. Our politicians we be even shallower, our law enforcement won't even understand the limits of it's brutality, the standards of our entertainment will be bottomless and our true thinkers will be alienated to degrees not seen in centuries. This struggle isn't really separated from the wall street, civil rights and other struggles when you really think about it.

Anyway man, just look after the kids a little bit. A little attention means everything to them. And it can often get them to work harder to close those gaps they are experiencing, you know, those "achievement deficits." If you've read this far, you're a wise person with something valuable to share with a kid. I appreciate you ahead of time for it.

Right, this is nothing you haven't heard before. That doesn't mean you shouldn't hear it again.


I don't care if you condemn or condone, I just hope that you have the capacity to consider.


-I'm StarPower aka the Unforgivable Ola, and I approve this message.

"I don't stand for much, but if I fall for THIS bullshit, then I don't deserve to have legs."

"So I round up the gypsies,
and instruct them to move.
I tell 'em something just hit me,
y'all know what we gotta do..."

"It's not that serious," were the last words I ever heard him/her say.

Wednesday, October 12, 2011

Lost Rap Arts Vol. 1

Seemed to be a lot of double-time rhyming "special effects" during the ciphers at the 2011 BET Hip-Hop Awards. Seemed like there was a memo stating the participants had to rap like (a poor man's) Twista at some point during their verses to show off their talents.

That's a skill, definitely, but once mastered you should say/do something ill with it to be considered a good writer/rapper. Being able to do it should be considered a basic (higher order, maybe) rap skill, and no props should be given by a critical ear to a rapper who just shows proficiency.

Choosing fresh words to spit slowly over a slow instrumental is becoming a lost art. BIG killed "Payback" w/a monstrous intro, good word choice and fluidity, among other things. His pace was measured and rhythmic, perfectly in the beat, not afraid of spaces, something that frightens many rappers. A lot of emcees go double time as an instant reaction to a slow beat because they are worried about having to be really discriminatory with word selection, volume, tone, spacing, rhythm, cadence, rhyme pattern. A tongue twisting flow allows one to get away with rhymes they couldn't pull off with a more traditional pace. (I dont care what anyone says, during an otherwise top-notch lyrical display, Eminem failed by saying "kick the ballistics" in 2011. I dont consider it ironic. And the soccer ball metaphor did nothing to give him a pass on that one. Sometimes rappers bring back old standbys like that on a throwback, semi-ironic level. I used "Mr. Sinister..." as late as 2006, but that was...well, theres no way for me to objectively use that as an example. Tangent done.)

Slowing the pace while sacrificing none of what a rapper is revered for is a great talent. Even multi-syllabic animals like Nas, Pun and pre-"Re-" Eminem (Re-Up, Relapse, Recovery) had the versatility to adjust flow of words for slower beats in songs like "One Time For Your Mind," "NY State of Mind," "Caribbean Connection" and "Way I Am."

There's not much wrong with the casual fan being entertained by what amounts to parlor tricks such as simple tongue-twisting, "lyrcial miracle-ry" such as the type Em mocked at the beginning of the BET Hip-Hop Awards cipher, or punchline overkill. Usually they are able to recognize higher level emceeing, even if they don't purchase it. But it's problematic when artists use these methods to display their skills in a room full of other artists or at a forum in which they're suppose to show how good they are. If they get away it, that means audience has lost the ability to identify good writing/rapping, or have never heard it to begin.

That's how standards drop.

It's up to those who can, and who know, to constantly meet and uphold a standard that's been unofficially agreed upon since hip-hop began.

I'm StarPower, and I approve this message.